At 27 years old, Lamar Jackson became the second-youngest player to win multiple MVPs. He led the Ravens to the best record in the NFL, 13-4, beating 10 teams with records at .500 or better. Jackson passed for 3,678 yards and 24 touchdowns in addition to rushing for 821 yards and five touchdowns.

Lamar Jackson, the already two-time MVP, played a key part in an unstoppable backfield thanks to the addition of Derrick Henry this offseason. The two-time MVP has thrown for 39 touchdowns and just 4 interceptions, while racking up 4,807 total yards.

There's much nuance and context to explore beyond the stats as it pertains to the case for Allen or Jackson to be named league MVP.

In a perfect world, the Baltimore Ravens would have looked great and gone into the playoffs with an AFC North title and a lot of momentum. Instead, they were just good enough. The Cleveland Browns had plenty of injuries and no chance on Saturday,

NFL regular season has officially wrapped up, and voters are getting ready to submit their ballots for this year’s awards. ESPN NFL analyst and awards voter Dan Orlovsky seems to have already made up his mind about who should take home the Most Valuable Player (MVP).

There’s no such problem as the 2024 MVP race enters its final stages. Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson, Joe Burrow and Saquon Barkley are superstar talents whose conventional and/or advanced stats match historic standards for MVP consideration.

The Baltimore quarterback, who has the second-best odds to win the award, will make his final case for the accolade against the Browns on Saturday.

Romo thinks that Allen’s and Jackson’s MVP battle might likely boil down to voter fatigue. This means that voters would lean toward picking Allen, even though Jackson has been just as good, if not better because Allen has never won an MVP while Jackson has earned two of the last five.